Comparing Robo-Advisors: Goldman, Vanguard, Schwab and Merrill

Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

In addition to the robo-advisors discussed in Part I and Part II of our series, traditional investment companies, including Goldman Sachs, Vanguard, Schwab, and Merrill have developed their own robo-advisory services. These services allow companies to attract clients earlier in the investment process, as they are typically targeted toward younger investors and people with smaller accounts. The companies may then build a rapport with these investors before they are able to meet the minimums for full-service advising.

Given these companies’ longstanding successes and reputations, their robo-advisory programs are trustworthy options for someone looking to start saving for their retirement in a hands-off, low-cost way. If you or a family member already have an account with one of these firms, that could be a good reason to start your own account and try out their robo.

Some important things to consider when choosing a robo-advisor include the minimum investment required, the management fee, and the average expense ratio. The management fee is a percentage of your account balance that is paid to the robo-advisor for doing the work. Because the robo-adviser is automated, these management fees are typically lower than they would be if you were to hire a personal investment adviser. An expense ratio is the average expense ratio across the funds selected by the robo. The individual expense ratio will depend on your risk level, which will determine your specific allocation. Some robos include certain customized offerings that may also be of interest.