A US Soft Landing Will Rest on Increasingly Shaky Ground

Americans might be forgiven for basking in self-satisfaction when it comes to the economy. The country’s most prominent CEO, Jamie Dimon, has called the country’s boom “unbelievable,” and its most stimulating magazine, The Atlantic, has dubbed it a “superstar.” (“If the United States’ economy were an athlete, right now it would be peak LeBron James. If it were a pop star, it would be peak Taylor Swift.”) This week’s 50-basis points cut in interest rates suggests that the Federal Reserve is confident that the dragon of inflation has been slain.

The US dominates the industries of the future to an extraordinary degree. Sixty-one percent of global funding for AI start-ups goes to US companies, compared with 17% to Chinese companies and 6% to European companies. The US attracts 50% of global private funding for quantum computing compared with just 5% for Europe. Three giant US companies account for 65% of the global market for cloud computing. And so on and so forth.

The US also dominates a wide range of more down-to-earth industries from chemicals to pulp. One of the great pleasures of visiting out-of-the-way America is how often you come across world-beating companies in places such as Wichita, Kansas, (Koch Industries LLC) and Stratham, New Hampshire (Timberland LLC). If the world economy divides into competing blocks, as pessimists warn, then the US will continue to thrive.

Yet look a bit more carefully at this productivity machine and cracks appear. The extraordinary dominance of America’s “magnificent seven” tech companies is not necessarily a good thing. These goliaths may be hoarding innovation rather than allowing it to spread across the broader economy. And some of the country’s most basic economic indicators are flashing red.

The reddest light is the deficit, which is now 6% of gross domestic product. Neither Kamala Harris nor Donald Trump has a credible plan for addressing the nation’s debt problem. On the contrary: Both candidates have suggested spending increases and revenue cuts that would make it even worse, startlingly so in Trump’s case. At some point the markets are likely to intervene and administer a painful electric shock.