Can You Prove You're Better? Understanding ‘The 80/20 Manifesto’

David LeoAdvisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.

Here is a question we ask financial advisors at the beginning of every coaching engagement: Can you prove, right now, with data, that you are better than the bottom 80% of your peers?

Most advisors say yes. Very few can actually demonstrate it. Not because they are not good, but because they have never documented it, measured it, or structured their practice to make the evidence visible to clients, prospects, and the world.

That gap — between believing you are excellent and being able to prove it — is the central problem this article addresses. And solving it is precisely what “The 80/20 Manifesto” was written to do.

The Hands-Up Problem

Walk into any room of financial advisors and ask who differentiates on high service quality. Roughly three-quarters of the hands go up. Which means, by definition, high service quality is not a form of differentiation. It is table stakes.

Rita McGrath said it best: "Competitive advantage is transient, not sustainable." It’s a moving target.