Advisor Roundtable: Navigating the Complexities of Equity Compensation
Advisor Perspectives welcomes guest contributions. The views presented here do not necessarily represent those of Advisor Perspectives.
As equity compensation becomes a larger component of employee wealth, financial advisors are helping clients navigate the complexities of stock options, RSUs (restricted stock units), and ESPPs (employee stock purchase plans). Here, three financial advisors discuss how to balance the upside potential of equity awards with tax planning, concentration risk, diversification, and strategic exercise decisions.
How do you explain employee stock options to clients so they understand both the opportunity and the risk?
Steve Prediletto, partner, senior wealth management advisor at OpenArc Corporate Advisory
We explain employee stock options by starting with the core concept: An employee stock option gives you the right to buy shares of your company’s stock at a set price, beginning on the option vest date and continuing until the option expiration date. The opportunity is to participate in the company’s success and potentially profit as its value grows.
We walk clients through key concepts such as grant date, exercise price, vesting schedule, exercise, and expiration date, so they understand how the mechanics work. For example, if you are granted 1,000 options in a company like Coca-Cola at a strike price of $75, and after vesting the stock rises to $100, exercising those options would allow you to purchase shares below market value, creating an immediate gain. However, clients also need to understand that if the stock does not appreciate above the strike price, the options may ultimately expire worthless.
Markham Hawkins, senior wealth advisor at Quotient Wealth Partners
Helping clients navigate equity compensation has become a core part of our service offerings. Historically, this was not deeply integrated into financial planning, but today it is one of the biggest drivers of wealth for many professionals.
We approach this through dedicated tax-planning conversations, mapping out how equity fits into a client’s financial life now and over time. The opportunity is clear: Equity can be a powerful wealth builder. The risk comes from concentration, tax complexity, and timing.
With programs like ESPPs, we focus on the discount and the built-in return, then build a disciplined liquidation strategy. The goal is to capture the benefit while avoiding overexposure to a single stock. Diversification is always central to the conversation.
Brian McDonald, founder and CEO of Grantd
Employee stock options give you the right to buy shares of your company at a fixed price (called the strike price), usually lower than what the stock may be worth in the future. If the company grows, you can buy at yesterday’s price and benefit from today’s value.
Think of it as a reward that bets on the company’s success alongside you. The opportunity is real: If your company does well, options can be worth significantly more than your salary. But the risk is equally real. If the stock price never rises above your strike price, the options will expire and be worthless.
Also, if too much of your net worth is tied to a single company’s stock, a bad quarter or a failed IPO can hit hard. Diversification is something worth keeping in mind as your equity grows.
How do stock options differ from RSUs or RSAs regarding planning considerations for clients?
Prediletto: We often explain the difference between stock options and RSUs or RSAs by comparing them to a discount coupon versus a gift card.
A stock option is like a coupon — it gives you the right to buy shares at a set price, but only if doing so makes economic sense. RSUs and RSAs, by contrast, are more like gift cards because they represent a promise to receive shares at no cost once certain conditions — typically continued employment — are met.
Since RSUs and RSAs are delivered without requiring the employee to pay an exercise price, they generally retain value as long as the stock price remains above $0. Planning for stock options tends to focus on exercise timing, liquidity, and tax implications, while planning for RSUs and RSAs centers more on tax timing, vesting events, and decisions around holding or selling the shares once they are received.
Hawkins: Each structure requires a different planning lens. An ESPP allows employees to purchase shares at a discount, creating an immediate economic benefit. Planning centers on understanding the discount, holding periods, and when to sell.
RSUs and RSAs are grants that vest over time and are often used as retention tools. If an employee stays with the company, the shares vest and become theirs. Repeated over time, this process creates predictable income events, so the focus shifts to timing, tax impact, and integration into the broader plan. Unlike with options, the key decision is what to do once the shares are received.
McDonald: Stock options (ISOs/NQSOs) require the employee to pay an exercise price to acquire shares, which introduces timing and liquidity decisions. Clients must weigh when to exercise, potential AMT exposure (for ISOs), and the risk of holding concentrated stock after exercise. The spread at exercise is also a taxable event for NQSOs, adding cash-flow planning complexity.
What strategic guidance do you provide clients around the timing of exercising stock options?
Prediletto: Planning around the exercise of employee stock options involves far more than simply evaluating the profit between the grant price and the current stock price. It requires careful consideration of tax timing, cash flow, and expiration risk.
At OpenArc, we utilize Grantd’s platform to analyze, monitor, and model what-if scenarios so clients can better understand the economic implications of different strategies. Mathematical models can help quantify the potential value of an option, but real-world decisions are also shaped by behavioral factors such as personal life events, familiarity bias, loss aversion, and market volatility.
Ultimately, while an academic model can estimate an option's value, it cannot account for a client’s mortgage, college tuition obligations, or personal comfort level with risk. The right strategy balances financial optimization with personal peace of mind.
McDonald: The specifics depend on the type of options (ISOs vs. NSOs), the company stage, and individual tax situations. The core strategic considerations around timing typically include tax optimization, company milestones, liquidity planning, expiration windows, and broader financial circumstances.
For ISOs, exercising early can minimize AMT exposure and begin the clock for long-term capital gains treatment. For NSOs, timing exercises in lower-income years may reduce the tax impact.
For private companies, exercising ahead of funding rounds, secondary sales, or IPOs may be advantageous if a higher valuation is anticipated. Liquidity also matters, since private company shares may be illiquid and require upfront cash to exercise and pay taxes. Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all answer — the goal is to balance tax efficiency, liquidity risk, and the client’s broader financial picture.
How do you help clients think about taxes, concentration risk, and diversification when managing stock options?
Prediletto: We help clients manage stock options by focusing on the three core pillars of equity compensation: taxes, concentration risk, and diversification. Through Grantd’s technology, we use AI-driven risk scoring and detailed modeling to help quantify the risks of holding too much stock in a single company. The platform’s tax forecasting tools can project potential tax implications up to five years into the future, helping clients avoid unexpected tax liabilities.
Rather than simply advising clients to sell concentrated positions, we work with them to build customized transition strategies that thoughtfully reduce concentration risk and align with their long-term financial goals. The combination of experienced wealth advisors and sophisticated equity compensation technology allows us to provide a highly tailored approach.
Hawkins: This is where most of the real work happens. Understanding equity compensation is relatively straightforward. Managing taxes and maintaining diversification are much more complex.
At Quotient, we emphasize forward-looking tax planning. Tax preparation looks backward, while tax planning anticipates what is coming and allows clients to make better decisions in advance. Clients need to understand when RSUs vest, the resulting tax impact, and whether estimated payments are needed.
With ESPPs and other equity programs, we develop strategies around when to sell, so clients do not become overly concentrated. We also use planning tools to model future outcomes and advance the conversation. Most clients come in focused on what already happened, but better decisions are made when you are looking ahead.
McDonald: When managing stock options, it is important to help clients think through the tax implications of different exercise strategies, such as the timing of exercises to manage AMT exposure for ISOs or understanding the ordinary income treatment for NSOs, so they can make informed decisions that minimize unnecessary tax drag.
On concentration risk, clients should recognize that having a large portion of their net worth tied to a single stock — especially their employer — creates significant downside exposure, and they need to think through thresholds and timelines for reducing that concentration.
For diversification, clients should consider building a systematic plan to gradually convert concentrated equity into a more balanced portfolio, weighing the tax cost of selling against the benefit of reducing risk over time.
A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: Discover something new! Click here to register for our upcoming webcasts.
