Q2 2024 Equity Market Outlook

Election year reflections

For equity markets, election years traditionally start slow (and volatile) and improve with greater certainty ― e.g., once candidates are nominated in the summer and after Election Day, as shown in the chart below. The outcome of the election historically has done little to change this pattern, suggesting that clarity is more important than parties or politics when it comes to the broad market.

One notable takeaway from our analysis of data back to 1928 is that average full-year price returns in election vs. non-election years are basically the same ― at 7.3% and 7.5%, respectively ― but the path to getting there is very different, as the chart shows. This year’s strong start (+7% through March 15 vs. the 0% election year average shown below) could mean an even better trajectory for stocks if past cycles are any indication.

Different paths, similar end
Average U.S. stock performance in election and non-election years, 1928-2023

Source: BlackRock Fundamental Equities, with data from Bloomberg, January 1928 to December 2023. Chart shows the average progression of U.S. equity performance in election years and non-election years. Shaded area represents the Election Day window. Past performance is not indicative of current or future results.

Company chatter ― or lack thereof

While many have dubbed this the most consequential election in decades, that sentiment is not necessarily showing up in company rhetoric. So far, we see the lowest percentage of firms discussing the election versus any of the past three cycles, with less than 10% of companies citing “election” in their Q4 earnings calls. Mentions typically pick up as the year goes on, but this is the lowest starting point in recent history. One reason may be that the likely candidates, the current president and a former president, are well known entities, blunting the uncertainty factor.

Tempered talk
Firm mentions of “election” on earnings calls, 2012-2024

Source: BlackRock Fundamental Equities, with data from Alphasense as of March 2024. Chart shows the percent of Russell 3000 firms citing “election” or related terms in quarterly earnings calls during the 2012, 2016, 2020 and 2024 election cycles.

Looking across some typically “election-sensitive” segments of the market, green energy companies are giving greatest attention to the election with nearly 30% of firms making mention in Q4, as shown below. This is not surprising given the two parties’ differing views in this area.

Volume check
Firm mentions of “election” on earnings calls, 2012-2024

Source: BlackRock Fundamental Equities, with data from Alphasense as of March 2024. Chart shows the percent of Russell 3000 firms in the noted industries citing “election” or related terms in the fourth quarter prior to the start of an election year. Green energy represents U.S. names in the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Aerospace & defense, banks and healthcare are represented by their respective GICS classifications.

Investment considerations

The election is just one variable in the market picture this year. Others, like interest rates and earnings trajectory, are arguably weightier considerations.

Where do we see potential implications for stocks? The clearest may be among companies tied to “green” initiatives if the election were to bring a party change in the Oval Office that could affect some of the regulation and incentives tied to the energy transition. The election mentions among companies engaged in these businesses may be an indication of that concern. Importantly, this would not change our long-term outlook for fundamentally strong businesses in this category, particularly those with global operations. It could even present a buying opportunity in some cases if prices were to adjust downward on election worries.

Healthcare companies, which are typically in the crosshairs of political machinations, have had little to say thus far. Potential candidates are not campaigning on drug pricing or “Medicare for All” as in prior cycles. This muting of political risks further supports our favorable outlook on this versatile sector ― one with defensive characteristics as well as attractive growth prospects amid increasingly brisk innovation, such as the GLP-1 “diabesity” drugs.

Mega forces matter more

Overall, we place measured emphasis on the short-term political landscape in shaping our portfolios for long-term performance. More important than politics are the secular trends that we see driving markets over a three- to five-year time horizon.

As fundamental-based investors, we take a company-by-company approach to exploit the underappreciated and mispriced opportunities in these trends, often applying time arbitrage to capitalize on short-term dislocations in what we see as good long-term investments. We offer three examples:

1. Digital disruption and AI

We acknowledge that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), like every tech innovation before it, is on an excitement curve that can be followed by significant lulls in the momentum. But even in the moments of relative quiet there is progress happening below the surface ― and that means opportunity that may be less obvious to the broad market as well.

We are looking beyond the first layers of the AI technology stack ― data centers, chips and infrastructure ― to the next level of potential beneficiaries. GenAI is expected to become ubiquitous ― touching every individual and industry ― and it relies on massive amounts of data to perform and equivalent memory to store that data. Multiplied across the global economy, this creates substantial opportunity among companies that mine, own and sell data as well as those that organize, process and store it. We believe those involved with private data, which is deemed more valuable than the widely available public kind, hold an upper hand. Over time, we would expect new business models to arise.

2. Low-carbon transition

Mega forces are powerful, long-term trends, but they don’t necessarily move in straight lines. Slowdowns can and do happen. For example, while PC sales largely boomed from the 1980s to 2000s, there were individual years of temporary decline along the way. Similarly, the term “AI winter” was coined to describe several periods since the 1970s of transient ebbs in AI interest and investment. Importantly, slowing doesn’t mean a change in the long-run direction of travel, and that can create investment opportunity.

We’re seeing such a slowdown today in electric vehicle (EV) adoption. If you believe the sales decline is temporary and that the structural case for EVs remains intact, the recent pullback could present a compelling entry point or second buying opportunity in the EV supply chain. We see particular opportunity among makers of the technology components that go into both EVs and advanced driver-assisted systems for all vehicles regardless of powertrain.

Another underappreciated beneficiary of the energy transition may be public utility companies, which make their profits through spending on infrastructure. The transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources will require increased investment to build and rework physical structures, costs that the utilities will recover through the rates they charge to consumers as part of the agreed-upon rate of return they receive as a regulated provider. In short, increased capital spend on the grid will equate to greater profit growth for utilities.

3. Demographic divergence

Populations are aging worldwide. The number of Americans aged 65 and older will increase 30% from 2025 to 2050, according to projections from the U.S. Census Bureau. As people age, their healthcare spending rises. Data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services shows per-person healthcare spending among those 65 and older was over $22,000 in 2020, more than double the $9,000 annual spend of working-age Americans.

These structural trends are supportive of the healthcare sector broadly. Most recently, however, we’ve seen the profits of some health insurers dented by an unexpected rise in medical costs. We see the profit squeeze as temporary as insurers reprice premiums and adjust benefits accordingly. This temporary earnings setback masks what we see as a long-run growth tailwind, with insurers set to benefit across time from increased enrollments as populations age and demand for plans, especially Medicare Advantage plans, grows.

Our bottom line

A bottom-up lens can expose underappreciated opportunities or temporary dislocations in companies well positioned to benefit from the long-term structural trends taking shape.

We believe an actively managed, diversified portfolio of stocks can exploit the varied opportunities created across disparate mega forces in ways that thematic indexes cannot, while also allowing the flexibility to adjust exposures in an effort to capitalize as the individual investment theses and market dynamics evolve in what we see as a new era for equity investing.

This material is provided for educational purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of March 2024, and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. The material was prepared without regard to specific objectives, financial situation or needs of any investor.

This material may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections, forecasts, estimates of yields or returns, and proposed or expected portfolio composition. Moreover, where certain historical performance information of other investment vehicles or composite accounts managed by BlackRock, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries (together, “BlackRock”) has been included in this material, such performance information is presented by way of example only. No representation is made that the performance presented will be achieved, or that every assumption made in achieving, calculating or presenting either the forward-looking information or the historical performance information herein has been considered or stated in preparing this material. Any changes to assumptions that may have been made in preparing this material could have a material impact on the investment returns that are presented herein by way of example.

Investing involves risk. Equities may decline in value due to both real and perceived general market, economic, and industry conditions. Diversification does not ensure profits or protect against loss.

You should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of any BlackRock mutual fund carefully before investing. The prospectus and, if available, the summary prospectus contain this and other information about the fund and are available, along with information on other BlackRock funds, by calling 800-882-0052 or from your financial professional. The prospectus should be read carefully before investing.

Prepared by BlackRock Investments, LLC, member FINRA.

Not FDIC Insured • May Lose Value • No Bank Guarantee

© 2024 BlackRock, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. BLACKROCK is a trademark of BlackRock, Inc., or its affiliates. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.

USRRMH0324U/S-3460845

A message from Advisor Perspectives and VettaFi: To learn more about this and other topics, check out some of our videos.

© BlackRock

Read more commentaries by BlackRock