Beneath the Surface: Uncovering True Diversification in Emerging Markets

At first glance, allocating to emerging markets appears to add diversification to a portfolio. Look more closely, and the reality is more nuanced. In the late 1990s, the MSCI EM index was dominated by materials and telecoms, driven by the growth of mobile telephony and the internet bubble. Then, at the nadir of the global financial crisis in 2008, materials and energy together accounted for more than a quarter of the index. China's infrastructure-led growth drove metals and energy prices higher and rewarding the countries that supplied them for the following couple of years.

Today, this composition has shifted again. Technology now dominates the index, representing more than a third of the benchmark, compared with just 10% in 2008.

This concentration is even more pronounced at a stock level. The top ten holdings – mostly in technology – represent almost 40% of the index, up from 21% in 2008, with Taiwan’s TSMC alone accounting for some 14%. A group of five influential stocks– TSMC, Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, Tencent and Petrobras – drives roughly half of all earnings growth across the index. This is more concentrated than in the US, where a similar portion of earnings growth is generated by the Magnificent Seven1 of big tech stocks.

Fig. 1 - MSCI EM sector breakdown over time (%)

The shift in country weights tells a similar story. China, Korea and Taiwan together account for nearly two thirds of the MSCI EM index and a disproportionate share of index risk, particularly through technology and hardware exposure.

For investors already holding global or developed equities, this creates an unintended overlap with tech-heavy parts of the equity market, limiting the true diversification benefits of EM allocations.

Fig. 2 - Top 5 holdings concentration across markets (%)

Diversification is not defined by how many countries or stocks you hold, but by the independence of return drivers. Today, as those drivers become more aligned than many investors realise, the label on the tin no longer matches the contents.

This is particularly relevant for US investors with significant exposure to large-cap growth, where positioning has become structurally crowded. In such cases, adding conventional emerging markets exposure can reinforce existing positioning rather than diversify it.

Read more: Straitening Out