Too Few Stocks Control the S&P 500’s Future

Is it a bubble or isn’t it? That’s what everyone seems to be asking about the US stock market. I say it isn’t. A bubble to me is when price becomes disconnected from any rational, articulable value, the way people chased opaque schemes in the Roaring 1920s or the blind faith in new internet companies in the 1990s.

This is not that. This market is driven by some of the most innovative, impactful and profitable businesses the world has ever produced. Yes, investors are paying a bigger premium than usual — more than I want to pay — at about 22 times forward earnings for the S&P 500 Index. But the valuation is not unreasonable for such a high-quality market and well below what we saw in the late 1990s or even as recently as 2020.

That doesn’t fully answer the question, though. When investors worry about bubbles, they’re also asking if the market’s meteoric rise is sustainable. Possibly. But the burden of generating growth in the years ahead falls to a narrowing set of index heavy weights, leaving less room for error. If these high performing, mostly artificial intelligence-related, companies fall short of investors’ grand expectations, the market will slow or even pull back.

The likelihood all comes down to earnings growth — that single variable has accounted for more than 70% of the S&P 500’s total return since the 1990s, with the rest attributable to dividends and changes in valuation. To assess the outlook for earnings growth, it helps to look one layer deeper at its main drivers, namely revenue and profit margin.

While revenue growth and profit margin expansion contributed about equally to earnings growth during the past four decades, further margin expansion is questionable. This for the S&P 500 has soared to 15% from 4% in the early 1990s as higher-margin technology and services companies replaced lower-margin manufacturers.